Mit Originalartikel von W. Q. Judge, „Shall We Teach1 Clairvoyance“?
Von einer „Erweiterung der Realität“ heißt es in der Werbung, wenn Internetportale Filme in 3D anbieten oder zweitklassige TV-Sendungen via Smartphone Zuseher mit der Illusion der interaktiven Teilnahme am Programm anzulocken versuchen. Esoterik wird manchmal ähnlich als eine „Erweiterung der Realität“ aufgefasst, inklusive dem damit verbundenen Bedürfnis damit Geld zu verdienen oder zumindest ein bisschen berühmt zu werden.
Die Wahrsagerin, Deutschland, 18. Jahrhundert. Foto: gemeinfrei
Zum Beispiel durch Hellsichtigkeit. Schließlich stellt sich dem Sucher auf dem Pfad doch gelegentlich die Frage, ob die anstrengende Rackerei mit dem niederen Selbst der Persönlichkeit ihm nicht doch den einen oder anderen kleinen Vorteil auf der horizontalen Ebene einbringen könnte. Vor allem angesichts marktüblicher Stundensätze ab 50 Euro aufwärts.
Sechs Thesen der Warnung
Der irisch-amerikanische Mystiker und Theosoph, W. Q. Judge, hat im Dezember 1890 in einem Artikel der Zeitschrift The Path sechs unverändert aktuelle Thesen der Warnung aufgestellt.
- Hellsichtigkeit ist nicht automatisch ein höheres spirituelles Gut. Im Gegenteil. Es ist oft von animalisch-astraler Natur.
- Hellsichtigkeit ist angeboren oder antrainiert.
- Menschen mit der angeborenen Fähigkeit besitzen sehr oft physische oder psychische Probleme.
- Hellsichtigkeit ist unzuverlässig.
- Es gibt keine zuverlässige Instanz, die Qualität hellsichtiger Fähigkeiten zu überprüfen.
- Die Qualifikation eines erfahrenen Hellsehers verlangt das spirituelle Niveau eines Adepten. Solche Personen sind definitiv aber durch Suchen nicht auffindbar.
Fazit: Besser die Finger von dem Geschäft lassen – im eigenen Interesse und im Interesse der Rat suchenden Mitmenschen. HEINZ KNOTEK
Shall We Teach Clairvoyance
A Note of Warning by WILLIAM Q. JUDGE
MY attention has been arrested by the address delivered in the Adyar course by Dr. Daly and reported in the September Theosophist. It is entitled “Clairvoyance.”
Coming out in the Adyar course, it has a certain flavor of authority which will appeal to many members of the Society and may cause them to adopt the suggestions for practice given in the latter part of the address. Yet at the same time it is very true that the Theosophical Society is not responsible for the utterances of members in their private capacity.
The fact that clairvoyance is a power sought after by many persons cannot be disputed, but the questions, Is it well to try to develop clairvoyance? and Shall we teach it? have not yet been definitely decided. Hence I may be permitted to give my views upon them.
At the outset I desire to declare my personal attitude on these questions and my beliefs as to facts. In using the term “clairvoyance” I intend to include in it all clear perception on that plane.
- I have for many years been convinced by proofs furnished by others and from personal experience that clairvoyance is a power belonging to man’s s inner nature; and also that it is possessed by the animal kingdom.
- This faculty is either inherited or educed by practice.
- Those who have it by birth are generally physically diseased or nervously deranged. The cases where clairvoyance is shown by a perfectly healthy and well-balanced person are rare.
- The records of spiritualism for over forty years in America conclusively prove that clairvoyance cannot be safely sought after by persons who have no competent guide; that its pursuit has done harm; and that almost every medium to whom one puts the question “Am I able to develop clairvoyance?” will reply “Yes.”
- There are no competent guides in this pursuit to be found here or in Europe who are willing to teach one how to acquire it without danger.
- The qualifications such a guide should possess render the finding of one difficult if not impossible. They are: the power to look within and see clearly the whole inner nature of the student; a complete knowledge of all the planes upon which clairvoyance acts, including knowledge of the source, the meaning, and the effect of all that is perceived by the clairvoyant; and last, but not least, the power to stop at will the exercise of the power. Evidently these requirements call for an adept.
Who are the teachers of clairvoyance, and those who advise that it be practiced? In the main, the first are mediums, and any investigator knows how little they know. Every one of them differs from every other in his powers. The majority have only one sort of clairvoyance; here and there are some who combine, at most, three classes of the faculty. Not a single one is able to mentally see behind the image or idea perceived, and cannot say in a given case whether the image seen is the object itself or the result of a thought from another mind. For in these planes of perception the thoughts of men become as objective as material objects are to our human eyes. It is true that a clairvoyant can tell you that what is being thus perceived is not apprehended by the physical eye, but beyond that he cannot go. Of this I have had hundreds of examples. In 99 out of 100 instances the seer mistook the thought from another mind for a clairvoyant perception of a living person or physical object.
The seers of whom I speak see always according to their inner tendency, which is governed by subtle laws of heredity which are wholly unknown to scientific men and much more to mediums and seers. One will only reach the symbolic plane; another that which is known to occultists as the positive side of sound; another to the negative or positive aspects of the epidermis and its emanations; and so on through innumerable layer after layer of clairvoyance and octave after octave of vibrations. They all know but the little they have experienced, and for any other person to seek to develop the power is dangerous. The philosophy of it all, the laws that cause the image to appear and disappear, are terra incognita.
The occult septenary scheme in nature with all its modifications produces multiple effects, and no mere clairvoyant is able to see the truth that underlies the simplest instance of clairvoyant perception. If a man moves from one chair to another, immediately hundreds of possibilities arise for the clairvoyant eye, and he alone who is a highly trained and philosophical seer – an adept, in short – can combine them all so as to arrive at true clear-perception. In the simple act described almost all the centres of force in the moving being go into operation, and each one produces its own peculiar effect in the astral light. At once the motion made and thoughts aroused elicit their own sound, color, motion in ether, amount of etheric light, symbolic picture, disturbance of elemental forces, and so on through the great catalogue. Did but one wink his eye, the same effects follow in due order. And the seer can perceive but that which attunes itself to his own development and personal peculiarities, all limited in force and degree.
What, may I ask, do clairvoyants know of the law of prevention or encrustation which is acting always with many people? Nothing, absolutely nothing. How do they explain those cases where, try as they will, they cannot see anything whatever regarding certain things? Judging from human nature and the sordidness of many schools of clairvoyance, are we not safe in affirming that if there were any real or reliable clairvoyance about us now-a-days among those who offer to teach it or take pay for it, long ago fortunes would have been made by them, banks despoiled, lost articles found, and friends more often reunited? Admitting that there have been sporadic instances of success on these lines, does not the exception prove that true clairvoyance is not understood or likely to be?
But what shall theosophists do? Stop all attempts at clairvoyance. And why? Because it leads them slowly but surely – almost beyond recall into an interior and exterior passive state where the will is gradually overpowered and they are at last in the power of the demons who lurk around the threshold of our consciousness. Above all, follow no advice to “sit for development.” Madness lies that way. The feathery touches which come upon the skin while trying these experiments are said by mediums to be the gentle touches of “the spirits.” But they are not. They are caused by the ethereal fluids from within us making their way out through the skin and thus producing the illusion of a touch. When enough has gone out, then the victim is getting gradually negative, the future prey for spooks and will-o’-the-wisp images.
“But what,” they say, “shall we pursue and study?” Study the philosophy of life, leave the decorations that line the road of spiritual development for future lives, and – practice altruism.
(The Path, Vol. V, December, 1890, pp. 282-84)
- Das englische teach wurde als lernen übertragen, da anders als zu Zeiten von W. Q. Judge heute das LEHREN von Hellsichtigkeit kaum eine Rolle spielt. Heute geht es mehr um das autodidaktische Forcieren solcher Fähigkeiten. Red. ↩
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 25.02.2012 von Heinz Knotek